We speak English, Punjabi & Hindi.

Success Stories

R. v. A.S.

A.S. was charged with a number of offences including sexual assault, extortion, fraud over 5000 and identity theft. All charges were dismissed for want of prosecution.

R. v. M.S.

M.S. was charged with Impaired Operation as a result of single motor vehicle collision, having had a blood alcohol concentration over twice the legal limit. All charges were stayed due to a violation of her Charter protected rights due to the police videotaping her using the washroom in the cells.

R. v. S.M.

S.M. was charged with having care and control of a motor vehicle with his blood alcohol over the legal limit. He was found sleeping in the driver seat of his car in a parking lot. He was found not guilty as the Crown failed to establish that he was in care and control of the vehicle.

R. v. S.S.

S.S. was charged with refusing to provide a sample of his breath. He was acquitted after trial as English was not his first language and the Judge found that the officers did not account for his lack of understanding of the English language while dealing with him.

R. v. C.C.

The client was charged with numerous incidents related to domestic assault. After a 3 week trial before a Judge and Jury, the Jury found C.C. not guilty on all counts.

R. v. K.D.

K.D. was facing sexual assault charges arising out of a short casual relationship. An important part of the evidence was a number of messages between the accused, his partner and the complainant. The messages were found to be admissible at trial after a successful section 278 application. K.D. was eventually found not guilty by a jury after a 4 day trial.

R. v. T.P.

T.P. was charged with sexual assault against a minor from a historical relationship. He was found not guilty by a jury after a two week trial.

R. v. R.H.

R.H. was charged with having care and control of a motor vehicle with BAC Over 80. After a trial, the Judge found that the police officers breached R.H.'s section 10(b) Charter Rights, leading to exclusion of evidence and an acquittal.

R. v. M.G.

M.G. was charged with importing a large quantity of methamphetamine from the U.S. into Canada and was looking at 7-10 years in custody if found guilty. After the frailties in the case were brought forward during the trial, the Crown decided to withdraw the charges.

R. v. P.B.

P.B. was charged with Impaired Operation of a Motor Vehicle and Operating a Motor Vehicle with a BAC Over 80. He was acquitted of all counts due to the police having breached his Charter rights during the investigation.

explore

What client's say?

Halkiw Judgment Feb 28-I

McGroaty Judgment Mar 18-I

Scroll to top